Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Egungun of Lagos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. (non-admin closure) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:59, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Egungun of Lagos

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This article don’t have reliable sourced references, the articles looks like an autobiography and subject is not notable to be included on Wikipedia as a BLP article. I think it should be deleted Madeforall1 (talk) 19:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 3.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 06:16, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: Looks like a bad faith nomination. Meets WP:GNG and slightly WP:ENT. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 07:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Article is poorly reference and no significant of notability just social media articles and no reliable coverage about this person Madeforall1 (talk) 07:27, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * you can't vote twice since you nominated this. Delete it or I should strike it. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 07:28, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Struck. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:33, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: This nomination was made because I declined to help with an article (Diff). They think that their article was nominated for deletion wrongly. (Diff) Away from that, the sources in the article meet the GNG. A WP:BEFORE can confirm this but of course, the nominator did not do this. Best,  Reading Beans  07:30, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * You are saying the truth, thank you Madeforall1 (talk) 07:51, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @Madeforall1, are you automatically withdrawing this nomination? Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 08:01, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Yes, I don’t want issues, I’m withdrawing. @Reading Beans said the truth, my article did meet the GNG, so I think he article also did. Madeforall1 (talk) 08:04, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep: While the article and referencing are not perfect there is sufficient to retain and improve the article. Bad faith retaliatory nomination and purely disruptive.  🇺🇦  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:32, 3 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.