Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Egypt–Estonia relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Nja 247 08:53, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Egypt–Estonia relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

another random combination. non resident embassies. The Estonian govt notes that trade is very very low and there are 3 minor "co-operation agreements." Also some of the high level meetings have happened at Egypt-Europe forums not bilateral meetings. lastly almost all coverage has been in a multilateral context. not really rescuable. LibStar (talk) 04:10, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of significant independent coverage of the topic (as opposed to visits, which are generally but news). - Biruitorul Talk 04:42, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No independent coverage of the article topic. -- Blue Squadron  Raven  18:31, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Next to nothing in the news and .  I'm Talinn' you, there can be no de-Nile about a lack of news. Mandsford (talk) 23:39, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * hahah, now we won't have plays on words. in a Syria AfD, someone once said "syria-ously"!LibStar (talk) 00:04, 14 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - The article fails to establish how these relations are notable enough to warrant an article. Ed Fitzgerald t / c 06:51, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - too much content for an entry in the table in Foreign relations of Estonia - but does need better sources. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:56, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete in the absence of any reliable sources that address this relationship in a fashion that might help to establih its notability.Bali ultimate (talk) 22:58, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, nothing other than directory entry. Stifle (talk) 11:24, 19 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete No reliable soruces that adress this relationship. Hipocrite (talk) 04:42, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.