Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ehrman Mitchell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  00:03, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Ehrman Mitchell

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not nearly as notable as his business partner, Romaldo Giurgola. The few brief mentions I found were in articles about his partner. Does not pass WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 19:22, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:16, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:16, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:16, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: To assess the sources that has uncovered.
 * Delete -- borders on A7. The firm he cofounded is not notable, so there's no suitable redirect target. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:08, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable architect.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:40, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment, this could be a redirect to the more famed Romaldo Giurgola as wikireaders may wonder about the "other guy" who founded Mitchell/Giugola Architects (note that Mitchell's name is first), as for "the firm he cofounded is non-notable, that is debatable (rather there is not yet a wikiarticle on it) ie. it was one of the most important firms of the "Philadelphia School," (of architecture), has been commissioned to design numerous iconic buildings throughout the world including the Liberty Bell Pavilion and Parliament House, Canberra, and has received a number of design awards, its architects are also award-winning, but i digress:)) Coolabahapple (talk) 03:52, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete fails GNG Chetsford (talk) 21:10, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep I think GNG (and possibly WP:ANYBIO) is met.  (from the Almanac of Architecture & Design, which I can't vouch for),  (Pacific Coast Architecture Database, which isn't user-generated but does include "relatively unknown and unhearlded designers"), and  (National Park Service bio) are all significant coverage. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 17:10, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  A  Train talk 18:22, 5 January 2018 (UTC) Keep or include in an article on the firm. The sources noted above cocer his work with the firm and other aspects of his studies and career substantially. FloridaArmy (talk) 19:49, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - the citations which are significant coverage aren't about this architect, rather they are mostly about the firm, or his partner.  Onel 5969  TT me 20:54, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The first cite listed above is in fact about this subject. Other coverage does relate to his wprk at the firm and in partnership with another architect, but there is no article on the firm. If you wish to modify this entry to be about the firm I don't think anyone would mind. But the subject is covered substantially in reliable independent sources whether we treat it distinctly or under an umbrella topic. FloridaArmy (talk) 21:03, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
 * A brief blurb in an almanac which appears to list thousands of architects is hardly significant coverage. While accomplished, he does not appear to rise to the level to pass WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 21:12, 10 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.