Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ehsan Sehgal (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:01, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Ehsan Sehgal
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Subject of the article (User:Justice007) requests deletion. See here, his talk page and LadyofShalott's talk. I am respecting his wishes by creating this AfD, but this nomination should not be taken as a !vote either way. In the first diff and his message on Lady's talk, Justice is referring to this AfD and discussion which went on before, in which he was accused of bad-faith editing because of his "COI" related to Pakistani stubs.  Nolelover   Talk · Contribs  22:32, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  Lady  of  Shalott  23:13, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions.  Lady  of  Shalott  23:15, 5 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep I can see no rationale for deletion. Subject appears notable as per previous discussions. I note the subject's desire for deletion, but I'm unclear what influence (any?) this should have on our decision. Please clarify one thing, if anyone can: what is the connection between Ehsan Sehgal and Ehsan Mehmood Khan. --gråb whåt you cån (talk) 00:04, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * None that has been revealed, other then the possibility that they come from the same area. They are both Pakistani, but I can't be more specific then that - and neither can the IP.  Nolelover   Talk · Contribs  00:39, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Topic meets the notability guidelines per sources. Just as we do not create articles about people or companies because the article subject wishes to have a Wikipedia entry, so should we avoid deleting articles at the whim of the subject. Wikipedia is not censored - notability is what counts, and Ehsan Sehgal is notable. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 13:09, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, per Yunshui, no reason to delete. Though we should be respectful of both editors and BLP subjects, that doesn't mean they have control over their pages.  Though the page may have been started by a COI account, there has since been sufficient scrutiny by independent editors to produce an adequate page.  Though the process to arrive at this version was less than ideal, the current version is adequate in my opinion.  WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/complex 13:20, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep: Article is well sourced and no COI is visible on the article. It is written in a neutral way as well. --121.52.144.104 (talk) 01:12, 7 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep: per WP:Notability.He is notable.MJ84 (talk) 16:30, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.