Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eidos Institute (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:03, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Eidos Institute
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article was deleted after an AFD in 2009. It was recently recreated but is substantially different to that version. Having read the sources in the article and looked for more myself, I do not think that the think tank has received sufficient significant secondary coverage for WP:GROUP to be met. The only coverage I can find is in news reports discussing what the institute has reported, rather than anything about the institute itself. While Julia Gillard evidently thinks that the think tank is important this is not the same as notable. Whatsmore, I can't find any evidence to suggest that the institute has had a significant impact on public policy in Australia, as might be expected if it had done so. SmartSE (talk) 12:57, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:GROUP. --MegaSloth (talk) 13:52, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 30 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   11:38, 7 January 2012 (UTC)


 * delete overly promotional and lacking significant reliable coverage. LibStar (talk) 11:52, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.