Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eiffel 65 (album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 11:10, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Eiffel 65 (album)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unlike Europop (album) and Contact!, this album is not notable enough to have it's own article. I have no critical reviews on this album and, despite only charting in Italy, its... its just not notable enough to be here.

P.S: I like how the editors of the article put a "?" in the producer section of the infobox. EditorE (talk) 20:49, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  23:05, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  23:05, 26 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Utterly and irrevocably fails WP:NMUSIC. Qworty (talk) 23:06, 26 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the artist or label so does not meet WP:GNG and does not appear to meet any of the criteria of WP:NALBUMS . Normally I would recommend merging into the artist's page but there really isn't anything to merge, and a redirect really serves no purpose because it is a self-titled album so anyone looking for it will find the artist anyway. J04n(talk page) 13:23, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep: I was a bit hasty in my initial assessment, it reached #13 on the Italian album chart, meets WP:NALBUMS. J04n(talk page) 13:26, 3 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:45, 3 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Having articles on music, which have only charting info and no other in-depth info and critical reviews, are being put under discussion, so I highly doubt this articles worth being here. EditorE (talk) 01:17, 8 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NALBUMS, "All articles on albums, singles or other recordings must meet the basic criteria at the notability guidelines, with significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Transcendence (talk) 22:44, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, per Transcendance above.  Mini  apolis  15:08, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.