Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eighth Day Books


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:50, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Eighth Day Books

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non notable bookstore, references consist of passing mentions, links which do not mention the subject, and a lecture by the store owner talking about his vocation. Wuh Wuz  Dat  14:43, 20 December 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems to be a notable bookstore and small publisher. Covered in depth by a couple of online sources that seem to be reliable. Clearly a borderline case, but not as unnotable as the nominator claims, nor as notable as the article's author does. More than just your average neighborhood store. Kitfoxxe (talk) 15:25, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Per Kitfoxxe Peter.C  •  talk  00:56, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:29, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:30, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. Multiple references from third parties to demonstrate notability. StAnselm (talk) 03:25, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable bookstore. Qworty (talk) 19:31, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.