Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eisaku Kubonouchi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  Sandstein  06:36, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Eisaku Kubonouchi

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable as an artist/animator. Philafrenzy (talk) 19:07, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.  — Logan Talk Contributions 20:24, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 20:55, 24 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Here's an archived interview with him: http://web.archive.org/web/20090204094602/http://www.mbs.jp/chocolat/interview1.html, why isn't he notable? Moscowconnection (talk) 23:57, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
 * His body of work does not appear to me to meet the notability criteria for artists here: Notability (people) Illustrating a handful of Manga books and one interview on a web site (in Japanese) just isn't enough. Philafrenzy (talk) 09:39, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
 * What's wrong with Japanese? The web site is a reliable source. Moscowconnection (talk) 09:40, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I added the biography of Eisaku Kubonouchi. Case closed, I hope. Moscowconnection (talk) 09:40, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * He simply hasn't created an important enough body of work to meet the notability criteria. Being interviewed once and illustrating some books just isn't enough per the guidelines. Philafrenzy (talk) 11:54, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Created a manga that was made into a 45-episode series. Must be a notable creation then, otherwise it would've have been made into that many episodes.  And his first work was made into a movie.  The Japanese article shows more information.  Wannabe was also made into a television series.  So, two of his creations were notable enough to be made into television series and one was made into a film.   D r e a m Focus  12:45, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.