Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eisenhuth GmbH & Co KG


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 07:20, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Eisenhuth GmbH & Co KG

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

German company. Fails WP:NCORP, no notability. Sourcing is not WP:RS, independent or WP:SIGVCOV. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:43, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Germany. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:43, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep a notable old German company with a substantial history (established in 1945). Notably, the firm has engaged in meaningful acquisitions, such as Fuel Cell Plate activities of SGL Carbon in 2007, and the firm is notable by technical capacities, such as producing graphitic bipolar plates. Additional reliable sources might be added for those who have access to local offline depositories of newspapers, books and journal in Germany as such companies usually have tons of printed sources. --Old-AgedKid (talk) 07:51, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep notable subject. with WP:before it has enough reliable sources to count as notable. Academia papers are also present. --Assirian cat (talk) 12:53, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've added several reliable sources with good enough coverage. Given the firm's quite a long history and considering the German context, the notability is not questionable (IMO). I also noticed that Eisenhuth is a part of large R&D projects across several German states and universities. --BoraVoro (talk) 13:44, 11 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.