Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eject


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 01:54, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

Eject
Doesn't appear to meet WP:MUSIC, according to this, they are unsigned. - FrancisTyers 02:17, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

comment a band does not have to be signed to meet WP: Music. Why do people here have distorted perceptions of their own rules? I'm not saying they should be kept, but they should not be deleted because they're not signed by a label. That's ridiculous.--TaeKwonTimmy 04:29, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete pn! - FrancisTyers 02:17, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * "Promising"? WP:NOT a crystal ball. Delete.--SarekOfVulcan 07:38, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Compu  ter  Jo  e  14:06, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-Notable, I have CD's of myself too, Should I have a wikipedia article? B.ellis 15:51, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * yes! (well, maybe not =P)&#160;—  The KMan  talk  23:55, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, does not fulfill Notability (music) standards.&#160;—  The KMan  talk  23:55, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom Dustimagic 20:18, 7 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.