Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ekapshi Light Atmospheric Fighter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete all. Merging the info still doesn't help with the notabilty and sourcing concerns mentioned in this article Secret account 01:19, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Ekapshi Light Atmospheric Fighter

 * – (View AfD) (View log)



These articles are entirely plot summary without information, cited or otherwise, about real-world development or critical response. Content has no degree of verifiability or notability. --EEMIV (talk) 20:13, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article content is original research or is otherwise unsourceable to an independent, reliable source. Wickethewok (talk) 03:36, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment The few I have inspected contain no plot summary. I therefore wonder if they have actually been looked at before nomination, as the reason given does not apply. . DGG (talk) 12:22, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * They all regurgitate backstory and "tech data" and whatnot -- that's plot. Maybe not from the games themselves, but that doesn't particularly matter. Point is, it's all in-universe drek. --EEMIV (talk) 15:28, 19 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge - These are all Wing Commander space craft types. As DGG noted, the articles are not plot summaries.  But they essentially describe the craft with no out-of-universe analysis because there really are none.  It would make more sense to trim and merge to a list. -- Whpq (talk) 12:42, 19 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someoneanother 15:14, 19 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Merger into list, and/or transwiki to a gaming wiki. - Koweja (talk) 04:15, 21 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment - Please see this related AfD for, I dunno, precedent/similar thinking. --EEMIV (talk) 08:25, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge into a list - with appropriate redirects. matt91486 (talk) 01:32, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - Even list-ified material needs to be cited to sources, none of which are present in the article nor presented here. --EEMIV (talk) 02:43, 22 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. --EEMIV (talk) 02:47, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions.  --EEMIV (talk) 02:47, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unless some viable secondary sources can be found (I will try and poke around for some but I'm not holding my breath) Note that it seems these articles have already been copied to the Wing Commander Information Center wiki, which in my opinion is a much more appropriate place for them. Cecilkorik (talk) 08:28, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not real world, fancruft.  Doesn't belong in Wikipedia.  PKT (talk) 16:09, 23 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.