Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ekil


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Davewild (talk) 13:04, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Ekil

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Contested prod, not a dictionary of given names, not notable. GregJackP  Boomer!   02:49, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable, as far as I can tell. However, I disagree with the nominator's rationale that we are "not a dictionary of given names". We have, and should have, many well-referenced articles about notable given names, including my own given name, James (name). It is just that the name itself must be notable. This one appears not to be.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  04:22, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - doesn't appear to be notable. CodeTheorist (talk) 23:31, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.