Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ekiri Litekia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete all. Hut 8.5 19:14, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Ekiri Litekia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:06, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following articles for similar reasons. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:10, 7 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:10, 7 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete all - as they fail WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Playing in a youth-international tournament is not enough to bestow notability - long-standing consensus and common sense confirm it. GiantSnowman 15:29, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:44, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:44, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:44, 7 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete all - no indication that any of these players has played at a senior level for a national team, nor for a club in a fully-professional league. Being part of an international youth squad is not an indication of sufficient notability, as has been demonstrated on numerous occasions in the past. C 679 10:21, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete being in a youth championship does not make someone notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:26, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. -- Alexf(talk) 16:31, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. — Joaquin008  ( talk ) 09:46, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.