Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ekobingsho


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:25, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Ekobingsho

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable and sources are not reliable. Just passing mentions etc. Arr4 (talk) 15:45, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Arr4 (talk) 15:46, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Arr4 (talk) 15:46, 24 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. No significant coverage. Woodroar (talk) 22:29, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Reasonable significance for a certain non-American culture. Staszek Lem (talk) 23:49, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:11, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk  13:09, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Cited sources are trivial mentions, and searches turned up only more of the same:, , . Therefore it does not meet WP:GNG. Consulting the essays WP:NMAG and WP:NMEDIA for further perspective, I don't believe the topic meets any of their criteria. The editor won a minor award for one annual issue, but the essays have in mind major awards and/or notable journalistic awards. The magazine has been cited, but only very rarely. If other editors think it's a "significant publication in ethnic and other non-trivial niche markets", I would not object to a redirect to notable founder (in 1985) and editor (until 2010), Khondakar Ashraf Hossain, but there isn't enough material to justify a stand alone article.Worldbruce (talk) 08:52, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not particularly notable. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 12:17, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom and above, particularly Worldbruce. Searches turned up nothing to suggest it passes WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 16:08, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete none of the four refs in the article talk about the magazine, they just mention its existence in articles on the long-time editor. Kraxler (talk) 18:02, 8 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.