Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ekol Logistics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:06, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Ekol Logistics

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. " Iteɪ was deprodded by User:Mean as custard with no rationale (despite the fact that I explicitly asked for one in the PROD). As I discussed in my Signpost Op-Ed, this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like company spam. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 18:54, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as complete advertising and there's all the signs: Multiple single-focused accounts, advertising information and the sheer fact there's blatancy of keeping that. SwisterTwister   talk  19:09, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable or advert, also remains too unsourced.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  02:54, 28 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.