Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ekti Tarar Khonje


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  Sandstein  06:51, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Ekti Tarar Khonje
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article should be deleted because it fails WP:RS, WP:GNG and WP:N. I researched for it but couldn't find significant coverage on the subject to have a standalone article. Harsh Rathod Poke me!  10:23, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Harsh Rathod  Poke me!  10:23, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 11:09, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

A list of sources are:-- ~ Winged Blades Godric 10:51, 25 April 2018 (UTC) Harsh Rathod Poke me!  12:35, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * KEEP Notable as a film. Articles in The Telegraph, News18 apart from two reference in article. --G (talk) 09:05, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * So you are saying that if a film got 2 or 3 news articles on the web then that makes the film notable. Can you please revise the policies I had cited above? For instance, take this 2017 Marathi film Aarti: The Unknown Love Story; It has got an article in Times of India. Does that make it notable? 😕 Harsh Rathod  Poke me!  03:25, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
 * It is a Bengali film, there may be more Bengali language sources. It returns sufficiently large number of results in English google search but mostly non-notable movie review. I presented the two full length article that I found in English at a glance. There were other passing mention like here . I think there is no contention about WP:RS. WP:GNG is in question, that is why we are here. I gave my opinion, I may be wrong. --G (talk) 05:59, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Passing by mentions don't grant permission for a standalone article. For instance, take this celeb Banita Sandhu. Three times an article was created on her and she also has sufficient amount of news articles on web about her but it was deleted everytime simply because not major amount of info is published about her in reliable sources. Also, why don't you improve it? Harsh Rathod  Poke me!  08:02, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Criterion for ANYBIO and NFILMS vary by a mile and at any case, you ought to know that other stuff exists. ~ Winged Blades Godric 03:47, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep--Passes NFILMS. All films which have garnered garnered two or more reviews in national dailies or reliable media-sources are consistently kept at AfDs.The sources are already there in the article and additional ones have been provided by Gboho.
 * A full-length-review at one of India's most prominent media-unit.
 * Likely paid-interview stuff but the film exists none-the-less.I won't give this piece much prudence, though.
 * Another significant mention at a RS.
 * More significant coverage about the film shooting, theme and all.
 * More coverage about the film and director.
 * Additional full-length review is also located at Anandabazar Patrika, one of the most prominent Bengali dailies. but linking an archive, running entirely on java-script, is tremendously difficult.
 * Comment: I see one editor here talking about mentions of the film in patrikas. But I don't understand why he isn't adding them to the article as references? How can I research and verify like this? I don't want to believe blindly. "Trust, but verify!"
 * Keep as the reliable sources including rs reviews identified above passes criteria 1 of WP:NFILM, only one criteria is needed. The nominator is also allowed to add the references to the article. Atlantic306 (talk) 20:58, 28 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.