Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elşad Xose


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Editors need to realise that the English Wikipedia has as its subject the entire world, not just our bit of it. If the sources exist, and it all meets WP:N or the equivalent, it is ntoable. That certainly seems to be the case here Fritzpoll (talk) 13:28, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Elşad Xose

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not notable Lida Vorig (talk) 05:48, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable, at least not in the English WP. McMarcoP (talk) 08:15, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * There is no such thing as "not notable in English". Non-English sources are perfectly acceptable under WP policy. Please see WP:NOTENGLISH. cab (talk) 15:12, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. I know what you mean, maybe I phrased my comment wrong. I meant - this page is of no interest for a non-Azerbaijani. Unless I am proved wrong, of course. McMarcoP (talk) 15:45, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Er, WP:NOTINTERESTING? =) cab (talk) 16:13, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I stand humbled and will remain in the shadow waiting for a decision in order to better calibrate my interventions in the future. Good learning experience. McMarcoP (talk) 08:16, 18 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions.  cab (talk) 15:11, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, notability has already been demonstrated prior to this nomination through the citation of multiple non-trivial newspaper articles about the subject. cab (talk) 15:11, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment All sources come from Azerbaijan. He's not notable in English speaking world. Lida Vorig (talk) 20:08, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * There is no such thing as "not notable in English speaking world". This is a ridiculous argument. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia written in English, not an encyclopedia restricted to Anglophone topics. Read WP:NOTENGLISH as I have asked you to do multiple times already. cab (talk) 23:09, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I have read wp not english, but I still don't see how a heroin addict rapper from a third world country who sold 2500 cd's (WOW) somehow deserves to have an article in English Wikipedia? My argument for deletion is simple, the article doesn't meet wp notability. Lida Vorig (talk) 01:23, 18 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep, user talk is seems to be loving flagging Azerbaijan articles without knowing the purpose of any of this articles and arguing that is not relevant for English Wikipedia. This user also has have previously warned about flagging Azerbaijani articles. So moderators, should be check her background first before doing any action.--NovaSkola (talk) 21:11, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment What I am and do is not a valid reason for inclusion. Lida Vorig (talk) 22:19, 17 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment I added little more information about him and put some new sources. There is good biography about him in Russian Wikipedia.--NovaSkola (talk) 07:28, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Most of the article is supported by a single source, a blog. love_krasotka, the author of the blog post, is not a reliable source. Lida Vorig (talk) 20:41, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep no valid reason for deletion given. I can decipher enough of the Russian sources to see that some seem good    3rd party news sources. Needless to say, we include articles on anything notable anywhere in the world. This is   the Wikipedia version written in English, not the Wikipedia on English-language topics.    DGG ( talk ) 03:30, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. per DGG. Neftchi (talk) 10:55, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.