Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El Diablo (Freedom Force)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 20:27, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

El Diablo (Freedom Force)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This character does not establish notability independent of the video game. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it doesn't need to exist. TTN (talk) 15:00, 14 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. TTN (talk) 15:26, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Additional Articles: I'd like to add the other seven characters in Category:Freedom Force characters for consideration in this AfD, due to being almost identical in style and layout, to the point where I'm nearly convinced if this is a copyvio. These articles are:
 * -- Nifboy (talk) 16:16, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * -- Nifboy (talk) 16:16, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * -- Nifboy (talk) 16:16, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * -- Nifboy (talk) 16:16, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * -- Nifboy (talk) 16:16, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * -- Nifboy (talk) 16:16, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * -- Nifboy (talk) 16:16, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * -- Nifboy (talk) 16:16, 14 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Destroy them all! — Original research does not pay. Unless it can be indicated the site of which the potential copyvios are occurring and the severity, we cannot G12 anything right now. MuZemike (talk) 18:33, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete all. Now showing of notability for these characters. Disproportionate coverage of in-game elements, as each character article is as long as the main article. ~ Ningauble (talk) 21:05, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete them all per nom. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 21:46, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete all: characters simple fail to meet our minimum sourcing requirements of reliable third-party sources, and thus fail the WP:GNG. Randomran (talk) 06:15, 18 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.