Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El Líbero


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  Sandstein  15:39, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

El Líbero

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non notable online newspaper. Fails WP:WEBCRIT. Most references are closely linked to the subject and some are even primary sources. Bedivere (talk) 22:08, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:42, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:42, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:42, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft-deletion: previously PRODded.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:40, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose. As it is possible to see by the coverage of Radio Cooperativa and El Mostrador the newspaper has achieved a "presumed notability" according to WP:GNG. Second, same sources also mention a number of significant right-wing writers collaborating in the newspaper. It also pass the "significant coverage" test by the coverage of it not only by Radio Cooperativa and El Mostrador, but also mention of it in CNN Chile and Canal 13. Dentren &#124; Talk 17:29, 19 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. There's a lot of foreign language references in the article; some of them to quality RS. Without a more detailed source analysis from the nominator, I'm not seeing a strong case for deletion in this case.4meter4 (talk) 18:41, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per 4meter4. I tried but could not find if the paper meets a notability criterion based on this guide. (The sources already on the page credit one of the paper's editors for winning a 2018 award for an investigation led by a Venezuela paper, but that doesn't meet criterion 1). If any one of the criterion can be proved, I will change my vote to simply Keep. Heartmusic678 (talk) 15:31, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - appears to have sufficient coverage in independent sources. I'm happy to reconsider if the nominator does more detailed a source analysis. MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:36, 24 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.