Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El Portalito


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:23, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

El Portalito

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:Casliber with the following rationale "emoved PROD - per book refs". Sadly, Casliber did not add said books to the article or to the talk, so I can only guess he meant Google Book hits. I've looked at those, but I don't see anything better then few mentions in passing, which is not sufficient for establishing notability. As I discussed in my Signpost Op-Ed, this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like company spam. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:49, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Leaning keep - I can't read Spanish, but hey the President went there. This sot of material is not covered well and hard to find (compare with English pubs for instance). Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:59, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Seriously? There's not even a hint of a suggestion of a breath of notability, let alone anything to back up the idea. --Calton | Talk 16:49, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:58, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Guatemala-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:58, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Fails WP:ORGDEPTH, next to no coverage exists on the subject, and what does exist does is not exactly encyclopedic.--SamHolt6 (talk) 08:40, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   12:39, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Even if an English pub had been visited by a president, that alone wouldn't give it anything more than passing significance - so rationale would fail WP:NOTTEMPORARY as well as WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. The place quite simply fails WP:ORGDEPTH. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 13:28, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NCORP. -- HighKing ++ 17:09, 1 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.