Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El Rancho High School Teen Court Program


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to El Rancho High School.  MBisanz  talk 00:09, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

El Rancho High School Teen Court Program

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Prod contested on the grounds of efforts to show the program's impact on the community. However, the added sources are court documents, and the only notability asserted throughout the article is that of the program's founder Raul Elias.  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 01:19, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers,  Riley   Huntley  01:33, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers,  Riley   Huntley  01:33, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers,  Riley   Huntley  01:33, 16 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. A search indicates that a lot of counties in the United States have teen court programs. The scope of this article is ridiculously small, and Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.-- xanchester  (t)  05:12, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * delete as we would for any such high school group  DGG ( talk ) 21:40, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, or possibly merge/redirect to El Rancho High School. Even if a redirect is not left, I would suggest adding a paragraph about this program to the high school article. --MelanieN (talk) 17:32, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * P.S. I notice that the article was written by an WP:SPA, and that its largest section is a full resumé of the founder. Just saying. --MelanieN (talk) 17:34, 18 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge - I will do it if nobody else will do it. Clearly run of the mill, unless a future president was the advisor or it has won some national awards, there are no reasonable claims to notability. Bearian (talk) 17:37, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Done. You all are welcome. Bearian (talk) 17:43, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.