Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El amor brujo (novel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ansh 666 20:38, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

El amor brujo (novel)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Crappy bot article that doesn't meet WP:NBOOK nor GNG. &raquo; Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  14:27, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:00, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:00, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Fair enough.
 * Relist. Unorthodox, I know, but there were too many of these quick nominations for adequate scrutiny. Coverage here and other book results here deserve more time for evaluation. Other uncommented nominations are being closed as soft delete, which is fair. I'd like this one to get more attention. Mortee (talk) 15:05, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –&#8239;Joe (talk) 15:45, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. Satisfies GNG. Regarding Mortee's link above, I suggest searching for "Arlt" as well as "Arit", for Arlt+1932, and so forth. This book is also known as Sorcerers Love, Love the Magician, Love the Sorcerer, Bewitched Love, Bewitching Love, Bewitched by Love, the Love Wizard and so forth. James500 (talk) 10:28, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * d'oh, yes "arit" was a typo. Mortee (talk) 00:22, 30 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep. I've had time to do a somewhat more thorough search now and this does meet the GNG. I've added three sources to the article and listed more at that I haven't yet put to any use. These show enough critical engagement that a full article could be written and, now with references, this is a viable stub. Mortee (talk) 00:22, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. Valid novel. jonnycraig888 (talk) 21:55, 5 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.