Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El chapo grande


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:03, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

El chapo grande

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This article is about a family's private dominoes game. Most of it is blatant hoax material. CSD was declined, PROD was removed, taking it to AFD. Kittensandrainbows (talk) 01:15, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not for things made up by one's family one day. Fails verifiability and notability and should be eligible for speedy deletion as A7, for lack of a credible claim of notability. I liked the statement of it being "alcahole associated." Edison (talk) 04:01, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete due to lack of sources conferring notability. It was I who declined the CSD - an A7 - and added the PROD; while I agree that there's no credible claim of importance, I don't interpret the article's subject as being an organisation and so I don't believe A7 is applicable. Olaf Davis (talk) 11:45, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Speedy delete due to the total lack of sources. This article seems to fall under the CsD for Blatant hoax. It states that it is sponsored by "dominoes(sic) pizza" and it also notes "(buy one for the price of two Tuesday)". I would drop dead if someone can find a valid link saying "dominoes" has ever even heard about this. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 15:07, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, it has become rather more nonsensical since I declined the speedy. Olaf Davis (talk) 15:12, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I raise my offer to $100 if someone can prove that "dominoes" supports this game. Also, I agree with the later comments, and have changed my vote to a speedy delete. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 03:10, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Perhaps not obvious in its earlier versions, but the current version is a clear A7 or G3. -- Boing!   said Zebedee  15:46, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per OR, though I suspect HOAX due to the lack of references and rather original writing style. Yoninah (talk) 23:27, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.