Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El stuffo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 03:17, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

El stuffo

 * — (View AfD)

It seems that I tagged this article for notability around seven months ago; since then, there's been no improvement. I would prod it, but, when I came across it again today, I found an incomplete afd nom, so I dediced (er, make that decided) to complete it. Anyways, delete per WP:NOT and WP:V. Picaroon 02:48, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. No context, no actual (good) explanation of the definition of the term, and what little there is...well, we're not a dictionary.  Add on to that the issue of WP:CRYSTAL: speculation that it will migrate to other cities. --Dennisthe2 02:56, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Format change. Doh! --Dennisthe2 02:56, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, as neologism. Phrases such as "used only in" and "high school fad" throw away the word's notability. In addition, "high school fad" brings up the guideline (in progress) WP:SCHOOL. -- SYCTHOS talk 03:53, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't see anything related to this in WP:SCHOOL. Am I missing it, or do you mean another page? Picaroon 21:38, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO, likely WP:NFT. Fan-1967 04:00, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. MER-C 05:41, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Sounds like nonsense. Wikikiwi 10:41, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete -used only in one town? not notable. --TeckWizTalk Contribs@ 23:40, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Even if the word were to spread as "other Anglo-Spanish words that have been created in Southern Spain" have not (according to the quote in the article), it would become a Spanish word, and should be a in a Spanish dictionary, not an English Encylopedia. It does seem like a good start to an article, and I wish it were, but it simply violates WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NOT. Enuja 02:50, 5 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.