Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ela Mishra


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was userfy. There is a consensus to move the article to TheAafi's Userspace at User:TheAafi/Ela Mishra. (non-admin closure) — MarkH21talk 03:35, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Ela Mishra

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No proper WP:RS, Fails GNG. My BEFORE ends up with no article's on google. --  Jammumylove  Talk to me or CHECK MY RECENT WORK 13:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. --  Jammumylove  Talk to me or CHECK MY RECENT WORK 13:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:43, 9 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Userfication request The subject is notable, and but sadly Systematic bias exists, she is a convert to Islam from Hinduism, and the Indian environment is not hidden, and this is why there's hardly no coverage online. Her book Reshmi Rumal Sharyantra was released by Indian President and received wide acceptance from Muslim scholars. See this Urdu report. There exists offline coverage about her but I'm not in position to update them now/or until the AfD is open. Hence this. I hope to work on this once I'm free for such works. ─ The Aafī   (talk)|undefined  14:01, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:22, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:23, 9 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Draftify/Userfy per 's request. It's true that systemic bias exists and is rampant in academia in many countries. The article needs time to be developed. Netherzone (talk) 15:22, 9 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep to improve article from sources perhaps more accessible to editors in other languages.Kaybeesquared (talk) 19:47, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, the first comment itself says that she had hardly any coverage online. In such a scenario, it fails WP:GNG. It's not suitable for inclusion in encyclopedia. Heba Aisha (talk) 03:41, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * ; GNG doesn't require online coverage. ─ The Aafī on Mobile   (talk)|undefined  05:56, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Move to user namespace per WP:USERFY. User:TheAafi has shown the willingness to work on this article further and he can certainly do so there. I hope this helps. With regards, AnupamTalk 01:53, 17 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.