Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elakkiya pithan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Materialscientist (talk) 07:08, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Elakkiya pithan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Possible autobiography judging by the username of the article creator. Uses YouTube, Facebook and personal website as sources and contains promotional language. The subject is "famous" but does not meet WP:GNG. The Average Wikipedian (talk) 07:21, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete This article fails WP:GNG by a mile. Eat me, I'm a red bean (take a huge bite)I've made a huge mess 11:32, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I would have speedied this if I'd got there first Jimfbleak - talk to me?  12:05, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable person - sources are all self=published. --Drm310 (talk) 14:56, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Non-notable and WP:GNG. Just tagged the page as needing third party sources. 220  of  Borg 08:43, 23 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 01:48, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 01:49, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 22 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.