Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elbazduko Britayev


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Tagged the article with Template:Expand Ossetian (after creating it). The Bushranger One ping only 00:36, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Elbazduko Britayev

 * – ( View AfD View log )

no sources Inthegarden52 (talk) 19:58, 11 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  — frankie (talk) 17:31, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions.  — frankie (talk) 17:31, 12 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Google Books Search: Елбыздыко Бритаев (his name in Russian) Moscowconnection (talk) 20:22, 17 September 2011 (UTC)


 * He's in the Great Soviet Encyclopedia: but not in the Russian Wikipedia yet: ru:Бритаев, Елбыздыко Цопанович. Moscowconnection (talk) 20:36, 17 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 01:44, 18 September 2011 (UTC)




 * Keep If the subject is notable enough for a print encyclopedia, he's notable enough for Wikipedia. Edward321 (talk) 05:12, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment There's quite a lengthy article in the Ossetian Wikipedia (os:Брытъиаты Елбыздыхъо), which even seems to contain a reference in Russian - would this be useable? Meanwhile, while the Great Soviet Encyclopedia was never entirely reliable, the unreliability was very much concentrated on certain topics. From the Google translation of the article, I don't think that it's significantly affected by the unreliable areas. So, bearing in mind systemic bias, on the basis that we have one immediately available more or less reliable source and that other probably better ones, in Russian and Ossetic, are almost certain to exist, I'd say keep. PWilkinson (talk) 20:19, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 10:47, 25 September 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.