Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elbrus Together (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural closure. This is redundant to Articles for deletion/Elbrus Together which is still open but seems to have fallen off the log pages. I'll attend to it.  Sandstein  12:57, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Elbrus Together
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Renominating since this was inappropriately closed via a NAC I didn't notice at the time. Same thing applies (and the last afd only had discussion in terms of keeps by two people who have heavily edited hte article and appear to be SPAs)

non-notable film, absolutely no meaningful coverage. fails WP:NFILM Praxidicae (talk) 14:26, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:49, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * , the NAC was just reverted on the first nomination, which has created a bit of a mess. Best, Eddie891 Talk Work 15:24, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amkgp  💬  14:45, 6 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment – The previous AfD discussion has received commentary as of 2 July 2020 (UTC), and remains in an unclosed state. As such, I have transcluded it below, so it can be seen here and taken into consideration. North America1000 12:42, 13 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.