Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eldaniz E. Mammadov


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 21:29, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Eldaniz E. Mammadov

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:NPROF as a part-time educator. Most of the information in the article is self-sourced (and a bit promotional). I tried draftifying this to allow time for the author to establish notability, but I was reverted. – bradv  🍁  19:09, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. –  bradv  🍁  19:09, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions. –  bradv  🍁  19:09, 5 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. A 2017 PhD is almost surely WP:TOOSOON.  Searches gave nothing towards WP:NPROF nor much of anything else.  Comment that it's possibly (but appears unlikely to me) that a search in the Cyrillic alphabet would be more productive. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 21:39, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing in the article looks like a pass of WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:17, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Don't be offended, I think, it is deletion action - vandalism party: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Eldaniz_E._Mammadov Mirzefilankes (talk) 16:53, 6 December 2019 (UTC) — Mirzefilankes (talk • contribs) is blocked for having used sockpuppets in this debate.
 * Keep. This sin will delete the page dedicated to the scientist. It is important to edit the articles on wikipedia, not just delete it.Malik202045 (talk) 11:19, 8 December 2019 (UTC) — Malik202045 (talk • contribs) is blocked as a sock puppet of Mirzefilankes (talk • contribs).
 * Comment that Malik202045's very first edit was the comment on this AfD. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 14:05, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Sockpuppetry has been confirmed; striking this and the next comment from the socks. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:55, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - looks to be a WP:GNG/WP:PROF failure. Perhaps it is the obscurity of the subject's field, but I am not seeing much coverage in third-party sources. SamHolt6 (talk) 23:56, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Really not worth deleting this article. This is against the principles of Wikipedia. He is a respected scientist at BSU.Ibrahimov2019 (talk) 11:51, 9 December 2019 (UTC) — Ibrahimov2019 (talk • contribs) is blocked as a sock puppet of Mirzefilankes (talk • contribs).
 * Delete. Nothing proves notability; an obvious promotion. My very best wishes (talk) 21:15, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 8simran (talk) 12:07, 10 December 2019 (UTC)Keep8simran (talk) 12:07, 10 December 2019 (UTC) — 8simran (talk • contribs) is blocked as a sock puppet of Mirzefilankes (talk • contribs).
 * Kenizx (talk) 16:50, 10 December 2019 (UTC)KeepKenizx (talk) 16:50, 10 December 2019 (UTC) — Kenizx (talk • contribs) is blocked as a sock puppet of Mirzefilankes (talk • contribs).
 * Serxanh (talk) 16:52, 10 December 2019 (UTC)KeepSerxanh (talk) 16:52, 10 December 2019 (UTC) — Serxanh (talk • contribs) is blocked as a sock puppet of Mirzefilankes (talk • contribs).
 * Delete Fails WP:PROF, and there's no route to passing anything else. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 17:46, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:PROF --SalmanZ (talk) 21:01, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete; fails both GNG and PROF.  J 947 &thinsp;(c) , at 03:09, 11 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.