Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elder abuse awareness


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 14:50, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Elder abuse awareness

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Pure advocacy. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:09, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete We already have the much better Elder abuse and this is little more than a "how to" guide to detect elder abuse. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  03:05, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Elder_abuse. As User:Cullen328 put it, we already have an article that goes over this topic fairly well. I do think it would be a good redirect and since the article is predominantly about warning signs, it would be reasonable to redirect this to the warning signs. However that said, if there is enough coverage out there to warrant a section about the various campaigns and so on to raise awareness (along the lines of how pink ribbons raise awareness for cancer), then it'd be worthwhile to have a section about the campaigns and then redirect this there. I'll see if there's anything out there, but it'd probably be best if someone familiar with articles like this were to be an active contributor this proposed section. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   03:41, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Actually, it looks like Elder_abuse already covers this somewhat well, so there's not an overwhelming need to create a new section. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   03:44, 3 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Cullen is correct, the elder abuse article is the correct place for whatever "awareness" issues might be identified. I see no need to redirect since the three words of this title already contain the two words of the target. Deletion is the proper path. Binksternet (talk) 04:12, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per Cullen and to some extent WP:NOTHOWTO. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  23:11, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:32, 5 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per Davey and Cullen.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 20:54, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.