Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eldomery-Sutton syndrome


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to MIPEP. In the middle. (non-admin closure)  J 947  18:21, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Eldomery-Sutton syndrome

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Original medical research. Contains no references, but includes mention of a paper published in Genome Medicine that has a senior corresponding author whose name bears strong resemblance to the editor who created the page. Fails to meet WP:MEDRS and WP:SELFCITE. Mduvekot (talk) 22:35, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:04, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment it may be OR in its current form, but it had been a red link on the article MIPEP already for at least four months - I don't think the topic itself fails notability or merit of inclusion on Wikipedia altogether; it may be possible to salvage the article by finding reliable secondary sources. GSMR (talk) 18:47, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

I will edit to include the reference to the publication. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vrsutton66 (talk • contribs) 19:28, 28 February 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:54, 7 March 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   13:07, 14 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep - single citation has been added. Haven't checked it for copyvio. Am pinging and  to take a look and see if they've changed their minds now with a single cite.  Onel 5969  TT me 16:34, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge to MIPEP. This is a newly-reported syndrome that has not yet had been reproduced in any other published studies and involved a total of 4 patients.  In other words, it is likely WP:TOOSOON to host a standalone article.  The contents can be fitted into MIPEP, the enzyme complex implicated by this study, without difficulty.  Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 03:33, 15 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.