Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eldrinson Althor Valdoria


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. As no consensus defaults to keep, discussion to merge can continue on the article's talk page. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:05, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Eldrinson Althor Valdoria

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

unsourced. non-notable fictional character bio that is inappropriate for inclusion. delete. Jack Merridew 08:20, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- Jack Merridew 08:20, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions.  -- Jack Merridew 08:21, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:43, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to an appropriate character list. Edward321 (talk) 13:59, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Changing to Keep Central character in a series that has won several awards, including two Nebula Awards. Edward321 (talk) 02:56, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as on of the central characters of the Saga of the Skolian Empire series. Otherwise merge per previous editor. Debresser (talk) 18:40, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * merge or keep if important enough in the story.  Any significant character in a notable work  should get a one or two paragraph description.  We're here to provide encyclopedic information--and if the main work is worth covering in the first place, people are likely to want some degree of detail. Why else would you use an encyclopedia  in the first place, if you didn't want detailed coverage? And,   there is certainly no   valid reason why there should not at least be a redirect.    Anything anyone might want to look up should have a redirect if there's relevant content in Wikipedia.  DGG (talk) 00:51, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - same reason above. not notable beyond contribution to plot. Savidan 17:44, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete this character isn't central to the plot, and that isn't a valid reason for keeping articles on Wikipedia anyway. Abductive (talk) 23:53, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep If its a main character in a notable series, they get their own article. There is enough valid enough to justify that.   D r e a m Focus  20:58, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Please point me to this guideline or policy that says, "main character in a notable series, they get their own article". Abductive (talk) 21:11, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.