Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EleMints (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:23, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

EleMints
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY Boleyn (talk) 11:56, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 12 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Could you comment on the four sources cited by a participant in the previous AFD, as to why they may not be reliable or shouldn't count towards establishing notability? postdlf (talk) 21:43, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG. No reliable independent sources. Appearing on the app store doesn't constitute notability. And the BW "source" from the last AfD don't even mention this product. -- 101.117.89.21 (talk) 02:09, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * For the record: the actual material is published not in BusinessWeek, but in this blog post. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 08:54, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 05:07, 19 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete: A couple of positive reviews can be found (amidst more about the mint oil product of the same name) but my view is that for an encyclopaedia these fall short of any of the WP:NSOFT inclusion criteria. AllyD (talk) 06:21, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete: I found no reliable sources on this subject at all. The sources from previous AfD are not reliable and are overly promotional. I can't find anything to establish notability of this software elsewhere either. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 08:47, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Appears to be festering self promotion. Maybe it is a good map, but nothing in searches is saying it's particularly notable. mol  uɐɯ  22:11, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.