Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eleanor (book)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 01:23, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Eleanor (book)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails GNG Finlan Bendbow-Rendeck (talk) 01:17, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the author, Barbara Cooney, or keep after we find at least three reviews. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 02:05, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment - It has reviews up at both Kirkus Reviews and Publishers Weekly. Neither are particularly long, but I've seen other AFD discussions consider similar coverage as being sufficient for passing WP:NBOOK. Rorshacma (talk) 05:46, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - The short reviews I noted above and the little blurbs mentioned below should be just enough to pass WP:NBOOK. Merging to Barbara Cooney is a possibility if there is any thought that the information would be better suited there than as a stand alone, but at this point, there is no reason for deletion. Rorshacma (talk) 21:11, 8 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:51, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Two reviews are sufficient, but there are several more easily found on gscholar, e.g. . Notable book by a notable author. pburka (talk) 13:22, 4 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.