Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electerodactylus portoricensis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete G7 and A10. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:08, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Electerodactylus portoricensis

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There was a spelling error in the species name, therefore this is a non existing species. The error is "Electerodactylus" should be "Eleutherodactylus" Mercy11 (talk) 16:35, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 * By the way, I was also the creator of the article, meaning, I created the article in error, but have since edited the correct (and pre-existing) article, Eleutherodactylus portoricensis. Mercy11 (talk) 16:49, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 * While we're at it, Upland coqui and Eleutherodactylus portoricensis should probably be merged. Chris857 (talk) 18:47, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Eleutherodactylus portoricensis seems to be the more complete of the two articles, and if you look at Upland coqui everything there seems to be in Eleutherodactylus portoricensis already. Perhaps Upland coqui should just be deleted as well instead? (But I am not sure this is the forum to "shoot two birds with one stone.)"  Mercy11 (talk) 19:34, 9 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom - in the future, you can go with speedy deletion (G7) for these. Also, I redirected Upland coqui to Eleutherodactylus portoricensis. Ansh666 20:45, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.