Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electric Palm Tree


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete / blatant advertising and no assertion of notability. -- slakr \ talk / 07:35, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Electric Palm Tree

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Hard to discern what this article is about: what is "a circle of critical art practices"? No Google hits for the concept, no references to sources of any sort, no context (eg where in the world is this project happening?) Kim Dent-Brown   (Talk)  16:06, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as advertising, possible nonsense, at the very least it lacks any sort of context. Note: A second nomination was opened about two seconds after this one by User:Mayalld; I speedy closed that since we don't need two discussions open at the same time. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 16:16, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete complete gibberish Mayalld (talk) 16:17, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete ridiculous gibberish. It's articles like this that keep WR in business. —  iride  scent  16:28, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:BOLLOCKS. --Nate1481(t/c) 16:36, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - per WP:NONSENSE or WP:BOLLOCKS. Can't decide which. Doc Strange (talk) 18:26, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per A7, appears to be promoting a non-notable group (or website, hard to tell which) and I've tagged it.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 07:14, 5 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.