Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electric sky


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.--Kchase T 08:45, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Electric sky

 * — (View AfD)

This is a book published in November 2006 by a press that doesn't even show up on a Google search. There is no sign that it has achieved notability. However, there are signs that this article is an attempt to give Don Scott and those who share his views on physics a soapbox, namely, the self-references to Wikipedia and how Wikipedia's existing article on plasma cosmology is "disputed for its neutrality". The article contains no NPOV content about the book, only lengthy direct quotations from its author on why he is right and orthodox cosmology is wrong. In short, this is a POV fork. Antaeus Feldspar 00:58, 23 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete and redirect to Electric universe (concept) per own nom. -- Antaeus Feldspar 00:58, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete -As above. Tonytypoon 19:51, 27 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete and redirect per nom nn notable and gets worse with quotes .--John Lake 02:47, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - zero results on arxiv.org. Fails WP:V, violates WP:NOT. MER-C 03:59, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom- and bow to the wisdom of those that urge a merge, I just don't see anything worthy here...SkierRMH 10:27, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - This also looks like it might be an advertisement. Dr. Submillimeter 11:59, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete yet more POV-pushing from the non-standard cosmologists. Guy (Help!) 12:03, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Advertising and NPOV. HEL 23:30, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Advertising and fails WP:V. Davidpdx 12:10, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.