Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electrical potential of the reaction


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep and merge. Wikiacc (talk) 20:21, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

Electrical potential of the reaction

 * merge into Galvanic cell that already has a large section on the topic and delete: hardly anyone will search this title. I apologize before the contributor for discarding his work, but one must really read while writing. Wikipedia has lots of stuff already. mikka (t) 02:26, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * merge somewhere - Galvanic cell, Electrochemical cell, Electrochemical potential, Electrode potential, Table of standard electrode potentials, or ... Lots of merging needed. Don't need this obscure title. Vsmith 03:04, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: (about title) i didnt make the title, another author had linked his aricle to this title, and i decided to fill in the blank, about the sources, u can take it fromany chem book if uve ever seen one. To me it seems pretty obvious.
 * I may not believe this, but plenty of use have never seen a chem book. I am sorry that some of your first contributions were not so successful; probably because wikipedia is still a big mess, i.e., poorly systematized in many places. I hope this will not discourage you from future contributions. mikka (t) 03:16, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: I have removed the heading because it was messing up the Table of Contents. - x42bn6   Talk  03:40, 12 October 2005 (UTC)


 * merge per mikkalai but make a redirect instead of deleting. --Apyule 07:58, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge as per Vsmith. -- Rune Welsh | &tau;&alpha;&lambda;&kappa; | Esperanza  15:42, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect. the wub  "?!"  19:59, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * What is the sense of a redirect? Did you read the title carefully? "Electrical potential of the reaction". I would understand the title "Electrical potential of a chemical reaction", but this one is just a phrase, as the author explains, red-linked in some article. We cannot have redirects from all possible phrases (unlike common misspellings). A proper syntax to do a link from a phrase, if you want a smooth text, would be this:   electrical potential of the reaction . mikka (t) 20:27, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I'm not too keen on having a redirect either, but I think policy dictates one is needed to comply with the GFDL. I have to admit I never fully understood that argument though, but it does seem to come up fairly often. the wub   "?!"  20:42, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * If the author merges his text into the main article themselves, there will be no GFDL problem. mikka (t) 20:50, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I did read the title carefully, and I still think that a redirect would be a good solution. I know that we can't redirect all possible phrases, but I don't see why we can't do this one. --Apyule 02:37, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
 * ZlatkoMinev 05:34, 13 October 2005 (UTC) From the author, since im new to wiki, and i have no idead what you are talking about --All i wanted to do is contribute-- i dont see why u cant move it, or redirect it, or if u wish merge it. Well i guess?
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.