Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electrical safety


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was redirect to Electricity. John254 01:01, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Electrical safety

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:Stating the bloody obvious. I mean, come on... an article about a common sense pamphlet on electrical safety? --Legis (talk - contribs) 20:51, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice. I can see an article existing here, but the current context is unhelpful for anyone researching electrical safety. Violates WP:NOT and would violate the previously mentioned policy if indeed there was one by that name. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 21:02, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not even worth gutting--Victor falk 21:04, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is WP:NOT a how-to B figura  (talk) 21:43, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete then redirect to Electricity just in case people will type the term-- Lenticel ( talk ) 22:03, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect as Lenticel said. The term is legitimate, but this article is pointless. Bart133 (t) (c) 22:48, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Support redirect per lenticel & bart133. Can I say 'speedy' too?--Victor falk 00:18, 12 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete and redirect as per prior 3 editors' comments. There could be a very encyclopedic and well referenced article on electrical safety, since much has been written on the topic over the past 130 years, but this article is not the basis for such an encyclopedic article. No prejudice against a future article on the topic. Edison 15:22, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect as suggested above and close per WP:SNOW. Pavel Vozenilek 22:52, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect. Maybe the pamphlet that it refers to can be transwikid, if doing so is not a copyright violation. jonathon 00:48, 13 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.