Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electricity sector in South Africa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure)  D u s t i *poke* 19:02, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Electricity sector in South Africa

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a very short article with no context to identify the importance of the article. "Electricty sector in " doesn't exactly justify having an article. Maybe moving it to South Africa would be best.  D u s t i *poke* 22:46, 25 June 2013 (UTC) Nomination Withdrawn  D u s t i *poke* 19:02, 29 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete or Move per nom.  D u s t i *poke* 23:05, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Please don't !vote for your own proposals as your support for them is understood. Warden (talk) 10:39, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. — Mike  moral  ♪♫  23:51, 25 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep We have numerous articles of this sort for other countries such as electricity in Mexico. A power grid is a significant piece of infrastructure for a country and so there's plenty to write about. Warden (talk) 10:39, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's a notable topic, and references should be easy to find. There already is an article on Eskom, the main electricity supplier in South Africa, but it should be possible to add information about other, smaller suppliers. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 13:44, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's entirely bare, but it's still a notable topic. It just needs great expansion, not deletion. Ducknish (talk) 19:10, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm fine with Merging it into South Africa - but on it's own, you're right - it's entirely bare.  D u s t i *poke* 19:17, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Merging into South Africa would be silly. It wouldn't allow for any of the required expansion. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:52, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.