Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electro Interstitial Scanner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW  MBisanz  talk 03:25, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Electro Interstitial Scanner

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Advert article for completely non-notable device Gordonofcartoon (talk) 02:08, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Lacks reliable sources to establish the notability of the device. Note that WP:MEDRS requires better-than-usual sourcing on medical topics. EdJohnston (talk) 02:24, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, almost worth keeping for comedy value, but the article fails to establish notability. Tim Vickers (talk) 02:59, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * delete - looking at insighthealthgroup.com/references it seems they already use French WP as a reference for this device. That makes me think that a originally Good Faith Article by the Editor has mutated into something not so good for WP. Exit2DOS2000   •T•C•  03:44, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete ad, unsourced, no evidence of notability. JJL (talk) 04:03, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ooh, unsourced medical claims which read like an ad for the device. Not good. Delete the redirect Electro-Somatography as well. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 08:52, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete; can't this be speedied? Nomoskedasticity (talk) 13:47, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as promotional woowoo. DreamGuy (talk) 16:40, 25 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.