Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electro Love


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was    Keep. Eluchil404 (talk) 19:55, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Electro Love

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Should be deleted until further information is available. Upcoming albums with definite dates aren't usually created until solid information exists. This album has no release date, the article should at least be shelved. Right now it's just a list of producers and singles. Fixer23 (talk) 03:37, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
 * This has been nominated for deletion before. And so once again I support its deletion. Its been so long since it was originally announced, that even the reliably sourced information cannnot be deemed 100% correct. Per the nomination there is no sourced release date, speculation over the record label, and a strong likelihood that the four singles released will not be included due to their lack of chart performance. --  Lil_℧niquℇ №1 &#124;  talk2me  17:10, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:49, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect. I added all the information to the singer's main article, so really this article is no longer needed. That being said, it is likely to be recreated in the near future, so a redirect would be more appropriate.  Corn.u. co.pia  •  Disc.u s.sion   14:19, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep The article is well sourced and has clearly been the subject of extensive coverage. The reason that upcoming albums usually don't have articles it's because there are no sources. That is not the case with this one. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 16:40, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Coverage in reliable sources appears significant, thus meeting notability criteria. Current information may be incorrect and required updating, but that's not a basis for deletion.-- Pink Bull  02:23, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.