Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electrodynamic bearing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Magnetic bearing. Consensus is that the subject does not warrant an article of its own, rather a paragraph or two on Magnetic bearing would do (non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk  18:57, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Electrodynamic bearing

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article created by a single-purpose account, User:JobanWiki, seemingly for the purpose of self-promotion. See for example the link back here from -- which coincidentally shows the exact same illustration as seen in in the article.

A checkuser for User:JobanWiki, User:Joajoaq, User:MagnetalWiki, and User:85.225.72.28 may show something, although we're talking about a lengthy time period. Krushia (talk) 21:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep, and de-peacock and prune promotional links. Otherwise well referenced (those conference proceedings are fine) and a widely adopted/discussed technology.-- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 09:55, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Not sure. I cannot access the refs right now, and neither can I really say I understand what the article is about. In particular, how does this differ from magnetic bearings?
 * If the refs allow for some writing, then it is probably best to merge into magnetic bearing, but at that point it could be just anything. Tigraan Click here to contact me 19:51, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  15:02, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge, already noted in a less promotional way by (passive) Magnetic bearing. Doesn't need its own article and lacks context the way it is. Still need to discuss editors' connection with the subject as they contributed to the magnetic bearing article as well. Jergling (talk) 15:50, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:35, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge into Magnetic bearing. The information is notable, but it is not notable enough to warrant an independent article for the subject and it is too peacocky. ✉cookiemonster✉ 𝚨755𝛀   18:21, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 23:04, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge as suggested. seems a reasonable solution.  DGG ( talk ) 21:22, 31 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.