Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electronic Shelf Label


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus, defaulting to keep. Tan     39  22:54, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Electronic Shelf Label

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not appear to be particularly notable, based on this. rootology ( T ) 03:28, 14 July 2008 (UTC) 
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a WP:DICT of minor, unnotable items. Artene50 (talk) 08:46, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  JForget  00:05, 23 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Evidently notable. Colonel Warden (talk) 11:54, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete and reply to comment above - No, it is not notable, google hits do not create notability. I've noticed that in many AfDs, you use similar arguments.  Please read policy before participating further, as your arguments ignore policy.—  Dæ dαlusContribs /Improve 01:36, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:19, 24 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BJ Talk 02:28, 29 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - For some reason the nom's search includes a manufacturer. Without that and even with restrictive quotes we get a good number of hits. But I would argue that notability is not that much of a factor; if a thing exists it should be in the encyclopedia. Notability, to my mind, comes into play with a particular instance of a thing, not the thing itself - like a particular song but not song itself. --Justallofthem (talk) 13:08, 29 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.