Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electronic negotiation (0th nomination)

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was no consensus, so keep. Deathphoenix 19:03, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Electronic negotiation
Circular definition, with some opinions as to its possible usefulness somewhere in the future. Radiant! 16:13, Feb 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Might be original research; being unreadable, it's hard to tell. My strong suspicion is that this is machine generated parody cruft. -- Smerdis of Tlön 20:34, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. &mdash;Lowellian (talk) 22:21, Feb 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * As has just been demonstrated, context is vital. This is a real term in the field of electronic commerce.  At the very best, this is keep with a humungous dose of  .  But instead I'm going to vote Merge with Business-to-business electronic commerce. Uncle G 01:44, 2005 Feb 24 (UTC)
 * Keep, deleting all of the content and turning it into a substub if needed. It is a very valid subject, and it's surprising that it hasn't been developed yet. --Sn0wflake 01:44, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep but rewrite. Megan1967 00:25, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep but rewrite. Papertiger 18:19, 8 Feb 2006 The topic is a very relevant one, electronic negotiation being a very active research area with a lor of practical applications. I agree it needs complete re-write, though. I might take the time to do it, but no promises.
 * If it needs a complete rewrite (and I agree that it does) and if no one has done so by the end of the discussion period, delete and post to "requested articles". A redlink is better than this.  Rossami (talk) 05:52, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.