Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electronic telepathy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

Electronic telepathy
The result was deleted as nonsense and per WP:SNOW outcome as show below. ALKIVAR &trade; &#x2622; 22:23, 11 September 2007 (UTC)


 * – (View AfD) (View log)

An essay (as far as I can tell), fails WP:NOR, WP:NOT, WP:V, and WP:SOURCES Rackabello 19:00, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Have you made a google search? It can also be an article by a starting Wikipedian who doesnt know how to brake in to sections, catigorisation, and the meaning and importence of references. M.V.E.i. 21:02, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep spam with tags, watch, and if necessary, renominate in a month or so. The term seems to be in current usage. Sheffield Steel talkersstalkers 21:25, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete . This definitely fails WP:NOR, it does not seem to be talking about the same thing as any "electronic telepathy" links brought up in google (determined mainly by looking for "trained telepathy agents"). Again, most of those links are either different conspiracy theories or about the neurophone.Hal peridol 21:30, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Although it's a neat idea-- something that measures different reactions to detect emotions-- there are zero sources, and even the author writes "Most of the data specs are de facto -Top Secret- even though they are likely de jure -Does Not Exist-" I guess they could tell me, but then they'd have to kill me.  Mandsford 21:50, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No possible sources; fails WP:OR. GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 21:57, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per GlassCobra, nom. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Accounting4Taste (talk • contribs) 22:12, 11 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.