Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electronics & Engineering Pte Ltd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:43, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Electronics & Engineering Pte Ltd

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non notable company Spaceeeeeee (talk) 11:24, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- Danger (talk) 06:18, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Cautious delete As far as I can tell, it's non-notable, but the name makes it difficult to search for sources without being swamped my millions of false-positives. bobrayner (talk) 10:05, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:13, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. This is a contracting and consulting company (a company operating in the audio visual integration industry. It is a contractor, consultant as well as supplier for Professional Sound Reinforcement Systems, Cinematographic Projection Equipment and Theatre Supplies, 3D Digital Projection Systems, LED Video screens and displays, Audio Conference and Simultaneous Interpretations Systems, Studio Recording / Video Production Systems, Stage and Ambient Lighting Systems, Stage Draperies, Machineries and Equipment) selling other people's manufactured goods.  I wouldn't worry about the difficulty of Google searches when it is unlikely that such a business has had significant effects on history, technology, or culture. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:47, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.