Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ElegantJ BI


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:06, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

ElegantJ BI

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NPRODUCT and WP:GNG.  Quasar G  t - c 14:22, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:54, 14 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - ElegantJ BI seems to use a proprietary technology Managed Memory Computing, a business intelligence tool and also at AfD, for data analysis. I think neither meets WP:GNG as I can not find coverage of either of them in independent reliable sources. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:45, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - The only reference is very clearly a press release. Absolutely no notability. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk  20:00, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is nothing to confirm the notability of the product, fails WP:PRODUCT. WWGB (talk) 01:16, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as unnotable and lacking refs. ♫ RichardWeiss talk contribs 05:59, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - as my nomination. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   23:56, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as well as  Managed Memory Computing which despite its capital letters is just a marketing buzzword. Way too soon for a Wikipedia article on either topic that meets notability levels required. W Nowicki (talk) 20:33, 21 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.