Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elegant Angel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Krakatoa Katie  20:37, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Elegant Angel

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable corporation. No coverage in reliable sources, no assertion of notability. Fails WP:CORP. Valrith 01:08, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k 01:44, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article could stand some expansion, but it's a notable company that has produced films that have won a lot of awards. http://www.avnawards.com/index.php?content=pastwinners Just the 2007 page lists 4 awards, 2006 3 awards, and so forth. Here are 3 wins at the 2003 XRCO awards: http://www.bwdl.net/XRCO-2/2003win/index.html ... and that list was in the article, actually: http://www.elegantangel.com/awards.html It does get coverage in the trade papers, and while most of these are just coverage of their latest release, "Elegant Angel Turns it Around" is coverage of the company itself. It even gets mentioned in the New York Times. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 13:05, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per awards and coverage. Epbr123 17:41, 27 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.