Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Element X


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Babajobu 13:09, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Element_X
Delete: Where to begin... this idea of an "element X" is simplistically extracted from a pattern of "four atoms fusing together" which is NOT how fusion works. Any element that big would be so unstable it would fly apart in an instant. EGGS 23:56, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm going to call bollocks on this one. --Kinu 00:03, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Ardenn 00:23, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Original research, without even the benefit of observational data (" if we follow the patern that has been set, four Einsteinium atoms would be fused together") Ruby 01:27, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * delete per Kinu. --K e rowyn 01:28, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to King Kong Escapes (no, seriously, Element X is a major plot device). 23skidoo 05:22, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect per 23skidoo, otherwise delete. Solar fusion doesn't create elements heavier than iron, and this looks like original speculation anyway. Zetawoof 21:23, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect/delete. The closest thing I can think of to this is neutronium, but that article freely states that its subject is primarily a concept from science fiction, and "Element X" is hardly an accepted synonym. Megane 04:41, 7 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.